Difference between revisions of "Verb Complementation - Norwegian"
Lars Hellan (Talk | contribs) |
Lars Hellan (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Instructions for its use are found at [[Classroom:Norwegian Grammar Checking]] | Instructions for its use are found at [[Classroom:Norwegian Grammar Checking]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Types of 'argument' constituents in Norwegian=== | ||
Grammar traditions often classify sentence constituents according to whether they are 'required', or 'valence bound', by the main verb; those that are, are often called '''arguments''', and those that are not, '''adjuncts'''. (Traditions often suggest that constituents fall neatly into one or the other category, and that no further alternatives obtain, both of these assumptions may be questionable.) The constituent types listed below are commonly considered as ''arguments'' relative to the main verb (on adjuncts, or ''adverbials'', see xxx xxx), and are found in Norwegian: | Grammar traditions often classify sentence constituents according to whether they are 'required', or 'valence bound', by the main verb; those that are, are often called '''arguments''', and those that are not, '''adjuncts'''. (Traditions often suggest that constituents fall neatly into one or the other category, and that no further alternatives obtain, both of these assumptions may be questionable.) The constituent types listed below are commonly considered as ''arguments'' relative to the main verb (on adjuncts, or ''adverbials'', see xxx xxx), and are found in Norwegian: | ||
Revision as of 11:20, 28 December 2015
This page relates to the application A Norwegian Grammar Sparrer, see A Norwegian Grammar Sparrer.
On clicking on the icon below, you will come to the Sparrer:
Instructions for its use are found at Classroom:Norwegian Grammar Checking
Types of 'argument' constituents in Norwegian
Grammar traditions often classify sentence constituents according to whether they are 'required', or 'valence bound', by the main verb; those that are, are often called arguments, and those that are not, adjuncts. (Traditions often suggest that constituents fall neatly into one or the other category, and that no further alternatives obtain, both of these assumptions may be questionable.) The constituent types listed below are commonly considered as arguments relative to the main verb (on adjuncts, or adverbials, see xxx xxx), and are found in Norwegian:
subject
object ('direct object')
indirect object (used in combination with 'direct object')
sentential complement (when not being classified as object)
oblique, i.e., a PP where the governed NP has a role defined relative to the head
the 'presented' NP in a presentational construction
secondary predicate
complement of an identifying Copula
'adverbial complement', i.e., a PP, Adv or AdvP serving as complement
'particle', an adverb with aspectual or less tangible impact
SUBJ - subject
OBJ - object ('direct object')
IOBJ - indirect object (used in combination with 'direct object')
COMP - sentential complement (when not being classified as object)
OBL - oblique, i.e., a PP where the governed NP has a role defined relative to the head
PRESENTED - the 'presented' NP in a presentational construction
SECPRED - secondary predicate
IDNT - complement of an identifying Copula
ADVBL - 'adverbial complement', i.e., a PP, Adv or AdvP serving as complement
PRTCL - 'particle', an adverb with aspectual or less tangible impact
The basic shape of a Norwegian clause can be depicted as in (I) below. The subject precedes the verb, objects immediately follow the verb and precede any oblique arguments or adverbials. When there are two objects, the indirect object is the one occurring closest to the main verb. Case is marked only on personal pronouns, with a subject – non-subject distinction. (See Personal pronouns in Norwegian.) Subject and Main Verb (marked in boldface in (I)) are generally necessary for making a grammatically wellformed clause.
(I) Subject Vmain IndirectObject DirectObject Oblique Adverbial
(1) Example with the pattern [ Subject Vmain IndirectObject DirectObject Adverbial ]:
Jeg |
jeg |
1SGNOM |
PN |
skjenker | |
skjenk | er |
give | PRES |
V |
deg |
deg |
2SGACC |
PN |
et |
et |
INDEFNEUTSG |
ART |
sverd |
sverd |
sword |
N |
før |
før |
before |
PREP |
slaget | |
slag | et |
battle | NEUTSGDEF |
N |
Subject Vmain Indir.Obj. DirectObject Adverbial
(2) Example with the pattern [ Subject Vmain Oblique Adverbial ]:
Jeg |
jeg |
1SGNOM |
PN |
snakket | |
snakke | t |
talk | PRET |
V |
om |
om |
about |
PREP |
henne |
henne |
3SGFEMACC |
PN |
etter |
etter |
after |
PREP |
slaget | |
slag | et |
battle | NEUTSGDEF |
N |
Subject Vmain Oblique Adverbial
For a detailed survey of construction types instantiating these functions and combinations of them, see
- Verbconstructions Norwegian - intransitive,
- Verbconstructions Norwegian - transitive,
- Verbconstructions Norwegian - ditransitive and copular.
Special topics addressed in A Norwegian Grammar Sparrer:
Infinitival complements, and homophony of coordinating conjunction and infinitival marker
By 'infinitival complements' we mean infinitival expressions serving as subject, object or oblique relative to a verb (called the 'matrix verb'). These expressions are built up exactly in the same way as subordinate finite clauses, except for lacking a subject, and having the first verb in infinitival form. They are usually initiated by the infinitival marker å.
This marker is homophonous to the coordinationg conjunction og. The simplest practical way of deciding whether to use å or og in a given construction is by comparison with English: where you would use and in English, use og, and where you would use to in English, use å.
Predicatives following copulas, and adjective agreement
The Norwegian copula verbs are være and bli. They can not be omitted. The predicative following them can be formally of any type: AP, NP, PP. Adjectives occurring as predicative are in the strong form (cf. theinflection patterns described in The Noun Phrase - Norwegian), and agree in number and gender with the subject.
Obligatorily transitive verbs
An example in English of this category is devour: as opposed to eat, it requires that its logical object always be expressed. The Norwegian counterpart to devour is fortære. Notice that no matter how salient from context the object may be, it has to be expressed (as opposed to many languages which can drop an object when contextually given).
Reflexive verbs
Reflexive verbs are verbs which are necessarily followed by a reflexive pronoun, a form of seg (see The Noun Phrase - Norwegian under Reflexives). Examples are skamme seg and liste seg, and the former takes the paradigm:
jeg skammer meg
du skammer deg
han skammer seg
hun skammer seg
den skammer seg
det skammer seg
vi skammer oss
dere skammer dere
de skammer seg
Related pages
Subject-Verb Inversion in Norwegian
Sentence adverbials in Norwegian
Past and Perfective patterns in Norwegian
Personal pronouns in Norwegian
Agreement in Norwegian noun phrases
Definite determiners in Norwegian
Possessive constructions in Norwegian
Coordination marking in Norwegian
--Lars Hellan 20:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)