Difference between revisions of "Annotating Edo"

Revision as of 22:23, 5 January 2010

Annotations from March 2009:

1. Òzó suá Àzàrí dé

2. Òzó lé ìzẹ́ ré

3. Òzó miẹ̣́n àlìmóí kpá!án

4. Òzó gá ẹ̣̣̣́bọ̣̣̣̀ miẹ̣̣̣́n òkán

5. Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ rrí ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré

6. Òzó lé ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀ kpòló òwá

7. Íràn kùgbé-rè tòbíràn rrí ízẹ̣̣̣̣̀

8. Òzó miẹ̣̣̣̣́n àkhé guọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣́

9. Òzó kòkó Àdésúwà mòsé

10. Òzó dẹ̣̣̣̣́ ìyán dùnmwún

11. Íràn sá àmẹ̣̣̣̣̀ wọ̣̣̣̣́n

12. Òzó gbọ̣̣̣̣̀ọ̣̣̣̣́ ívìn , bòló òká

13. Òzó rhùlẹ̣̣̣̣́ -rè kpàá

14. Òzó rhìé ẹ̣̣̣̣̀hò fián ávbé àlímóí

15. Òzó lé ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́ khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

16. Íràn kùgbé-rè kó!kó ìzẹ̣̣̣̣̣́

17. Òzó rhùlé ̣rè làọ̣̣̣̣́ òwá

18. ??Ú-fí- mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré ọ̣̣̣̣̀ fí akhe gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́ guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́

19. *Ú-ghọ̣̣̣̣́!ghọ̣̣̣̣̀-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Òzó fí àkhé gìẹ̣̣̣̣́gìẹ̣̣̣̣́ guọ̣̣̣̣̀ghọ̣̣̣̣́

20. Ù-lé -mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

21. Ù-khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n-mwẹ̣̣̣̣̀n ọ̣̣̣̣̀ré Úyi lé èvbárè khiẹ̣̣̣̣́n

22. Òzó viẹ̣̣̣̣́rè fòó

DRAFT WITH SUGGESTIONS

1. sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)

sv-v1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su

v2-int => v2tr (here v2 is unaccusative and intransitive) In my analysis in my dissertation it inherits from the type intrans-verb-lxm

"v1obIDv2su" is for area 2.correction done

2. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff-v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing)) svsuObIDsuAgobAff => svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff

CAP S after 'sv', and 'IDALL' instead of 'ID', in this connection (area 1 of mv). Please apply these two changes in all examples relevant. OK

3. svSuObIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v2tr-EVENTOVERLAP (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

svsuObIDsuAgob => svSuObIDALLsuAg. Here, the verbs in series share object tokens but with different thematic roles. I suggest that we include this information in area 2 v1tr-v2tr = v1tr-v1obPrcpt-v2tr-v2obAff. Here I have used the tag Prcpt to indicate the perceived entity as opposed to the tag Presit that indicates a perceived situation

4. mvcsuID-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSERESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))

'I have not used the tag IDALL here in area 1 because the shared NP subject do not have the same theta role as indicated in area 2.'

Should be 'sv'.Negative resultatives are not svs calling them that may be misleading. I suggest we use the tag mvc -multi verb constructions- for these construction types. Area 1 nrcsuID = mvcsuID

Sure this is CAUSE_RESULT? during our discussion we considered labeling the situation type as an EventSEQ but the event depicted by v1 brings about the resultant state in v2 and tests I applied to this construction type in my thesis show that there is a causation relation linking v1 and v2.

5. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and overt reference object sharing)) ccsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg

6. ccSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff- EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects)) ccsuIDsuAg = ccSuIDALLsuAg.

7.mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-EVENTOVERLAP (Comitative construction (covert reference subject sharing)) 'svsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg. The construction type is not an svc. I have therefor used the tag mvc.'

8. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff-v1tr-v2tr-EVENTOVERLAP (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

9. sv-v1obIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg-v1obAff-v2int-v2obAff-CAUSERESULT (Resultative construction (switch reference))

svv1obIDv2su => sv-v1obIDv2su

v2-int => v2tr see comment for example 1 above.

10. svSuIDALLsuAg- v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAffincrem-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

v2obAffThincrem => v2obAffincrem (same in 11)

11. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAffincrem-v1tr-v2intr- EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

12. ccSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- EVENTSEQ (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects)) svsuIDsuAg = ccSuIDALLsuAg.

13. v-intr-suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED ( V+modifier construction (V2 is reanalyzed as adverb) movement is away from the speaker)

14. mvcSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENT_INSTR (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing)) 'icsuIDsuAg = mvcSuIDALLsuAg. Do we label the situation type as EVENTINSTR following the convention we have adopted for the other situation types?'

v1obInstr => v1obTh (relative to v1, it is a theme)

15. svSuObIDALLsuAgobAff- v1tr-v2tr-EVENTSEQ (Consecutive construction (token subject and object sharing))

17. v-intrObl-suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED (V+modifier construction- locational construction ( V2 is reanalyzed as an adverb))

vintrOblsuAg => v-intrObl-suAg (the compacting is only for multiverbs)

18.svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

19. svSuIDALLsuAg-v1tr-v1obAffincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-EVENTSEQ (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

v1obAffThincrem => v1obAffincrem (same in 20)

20. v-intr-suAg-STATE (V+modifier construction)

vintrsuAg => v-intr-suAg

COPY USED FOR DISCUSSION

1. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-int-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction-Switch reference)

2. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr-CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

3. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr- CAUSE_RESULT (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

4. nrc_suID- v1tr-v1su-Ag_v1obAff-v2tr-v2suAgsens_v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Negative resultatives(token subject sharing and different objects))

5. cc_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and overt reference object sharing))

6. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects))

7. sv_suID_suAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (Comitative construction (covert reference subject sharing))

8. sv_suObID_suAg_obAFF-v1tr-v2tr-CAUSE_RESULT (Purpose construction (token subject and object sharing))

9. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg-v1obAff-v2-int-v2obAff-CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction (switch reference))

10. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

11. sv_suObID_suAg_obThincrem-v1tr-v2intr- CAUSE_RESULT (Consequential construction (token subject and object sharing))

12. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obThincrem- CAUSE_RESULT (Covert Co-ordination (covert reference subject sharing and different objects))

13. mc-vintr_suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED ( V+modifier construction (V2 is reanalyzed as adverb) movement is away from the speaker)

14. ic_suID_suAg-v1tr-v1obAff-v2tr-v2obAff-CUTTING (V+infinitival complement construction ( covert reference subject sharing))

15. sv_suObID_suAg_obAff- v1tr-v2tr-TRANSFER (Consecutive construction (token subject and object sharing))

16. ic_suID_suAg-v2tr-v2obThincrem-CAUSE_RESULT (V+infinitival complement construction- Instrumental ( covert reference subject sharing))

17. mc-vintr_suAg-ACHVMNT-MOTION_DIRECTED (V+modifier construction- locational construction ( V2 is reanalyzed as an adverb))

18. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-intr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction. V1 predicate focus (Baker and Stewart 1999))

19. sv-v1objIDv2su-v1tr-v1suAg_v1obAff-v2-intr-v2obAff- CAUSE_RESULT (Resultative construction. V2 predicate focus (Baker and Stewart 1999))

20. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obThincrem-v2tr-v2obAff-TRANSFER (Consequential construction . V1 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

21. sv_suID_suAg_ v1tr-v1obTh-v2tr-v2obAff-TRANSFER (Consequential construction. V2 predicate focus. (Baker and Stewart 1999))

22. mc-vintr_suAg-STATE (V+modifier construction)