Typecraft v2.5
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Skrivesenter:Discourse relations"

(→‎Sense Tags and their meanings)
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
|sequence/temporal
 
|sequence/temporal
 
|conjunction
 
|conjunction
−
|og<ref name="NP">Notice that 'og' and 'eller' can combine noun phrases, as in 'pc og mobilen' or verb phrases, as in 'jeg dusjer og fikser meg'. It is the latter case that we are interested in here.</ref>
+
|og
 
|-
 
|-
 
|list
 
|list
Line 56: Line 56:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|supplement
 
|supplement
 +
 
|adverb
 
|adverb
 
|alias
 
|alias
Line 61: Line 62:
 
|disjunction
 
|disjunction
 
|conjunction
 
|conjunction
−
|eller<ref name="NP"/>
+
|eller
 
|-
 
|-
 
|temporal
 
|temporal
Line 142: Line 143:
  
 
===Sense Tags and their meanings===
 
===Sense Tags and their meanings===
 +
 +
Having discussed with Cherise, we think that we will be best suited by relatively general categories to deal with young writer.  Consequently we have the following suggestions about the sense tags:
 +
 +
The following tags should be skipped:
 +
-conjunction (is covered by more specific tags)
 +
-contingency (as above)
 +
-contra-expectation (sufficiently covered by Evaluate)
 +
-exception (subsumed under Condition)
 +
-expect (covered by Predict)
 +
-justify (covered by Reason)
 +
-opposition (covered by/ a special case of Contrast)
 +
-supplement (covered by Restate or Specify).
 +
 +
Lars, February 2014
  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"  
Line 159: Line 174:
 
|compare
 
|compare
 
|nemjhv,erv,rkjv.,rj.rtb.gkb.ltkb.|Point out similarity or points of correspondence  
 
|nemjhv,erv,rkjv.,rj.rtb.gkb.ltkb.|Point out similarity or points of correspondence  
−
between two events, ideas, objects or statements
+
between two states, events, ideas, objects or statements
−
|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+
|(Jeg tror at barna hadde det fint) men ''ikke like fint som'' vi har det i dag
 
|-
 
|-
 
|ASSdesc
 
|ASSdesc
 
|assert through description
 
|assert through description
 
|Introduce a new setting, character or atmosphere of a narrative
 
|Introduce a new setting, character or atmosphere of a narrative
−
|
+
|Det var morgen. (Morten våknet til en ny dag...)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|ASSnar
 
|ASSnar
 
|assert through narration
 
|assert through narration
 
|Introduce a new narrative event or action that is not causally or hyponymically related to a previous event or action
 
|Introduce a new narrative event or action that is not causally or hyponymically related to a previous event or action
−
|
+
|(nytt avsnitt:)Morten gikk ut av teltet og bort til bålet.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|CONCES
 
|CONCES
 
|concession
 
|concession
 
|
 
|
−
|
+
|(Vi hadde det bra i hula) ''selv om'' det var lite mat noen ganger
 
|-
 
|-
 
|COND
 
|COND
Line 182: Line 197:
 
|''Når'' man går går på skulen, lærer ein å lese, skrive, rekne...
 
|''Når'' man går går på skulen, lærer ein å lese, skrive, rekne...
 
|-
 
|-
−
|CONJ
+
|<strike>CONJ</strike>
−
|conjunction  
+
|<strike>conjunction</strike>
 
|
 
|
−
|<how is this different from List?
+
|<strike>how is this different from List? jf. "Og så må en venn støtte deg" (fra en tekst om vennskap)</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|CAUS
 
|CAUS
Line 214: Line 229:
 
|Ask a question that will be answered in a
 
|Ask a question that will be answered in a
 
following unit.
 
following unit.
−
|
+
|Hva ville du gjort? (Valgt en venn som...)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|RESULT
 
|RESULT
Line 220: Line 235:
 
|Indicate an effect, outcome, result or
 
|Indicate an effect, outcome, result or
 
consequence
 
consequence
−
|
+
|(Pappa og mamma jobber så mye) ''så'' jeg er ofte alene hjemme
 
|-
 
|-
 
|SUM
 
|SUM
Line 229: Line 244:
 
|Ja, det var det jeg gjør på dataen.
 
|Ja, det var det jeg gjør på dataen.
 
|-
 
|-
−
|CONTIN
+
|<strike>CONTIN</strike>
−
|contingency
+
|<strike>contingency</strike>
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<strike>could you give an example?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
−
|C-EXPECT
+
|<strike>C-EXPECT</strike>
−
|contra-expectation
+
|<strike>contra-expectation</strike>
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<strike>could you give an example?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|CONT
 
|CONT
Line 250: Line 265:
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
−
|EX
+
|<strike>EX</strike>
−
|exception
+
|<strike>exception</strike>
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<strike>could you give an example?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
−
|EXPEXT
+
|<strike>EXPEXT</strike>
−
|expect
+
|<strike>expect</strike>
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an exampple?
+
|<strike>could you give an exampple?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|PURP
 
|PURP
Line 271: Line 286:
 
|  
 
|  
 
|-
 
|-
−
|JUST
+
|<strike>JUST</strike>
−
|justify
+
|<strike>justify</strike> '''This tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted'''
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<strike>could you give an example?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|JUX
 
|JUX
−
|juxtapose
+
|juxtapose [=alternative?]
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<Could you give an example? cf (...hvis vennen din bommer på målet... Du må si: )Ååh, så synd. Du klarer det neste gang, ikke : Herregud, hvorfor gjorde du det, din fjott?
 
|-
 
|-
 
|LIST
 
|LIST
 
|list  
 
|list  
 
|
 
|
−
|<how is this tag different from Conjunction?
+
|<how is this tag different from Conjunction? NP list here, or clause list?
 
|-
 
|-
−
|OPP
+
|<strike>OPP</strike>
−
|opposition
+
|<strike>opposition</strike>'''This tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted'''
 
|
 
|
−
|<how is this different from Contrast?
+
|<strike>how is this different from Contrast?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|PRES
 
|PRES
 
|precedence
 
|precedence
 
|
 
|
−
|
+
|<hov is tis different from ASSnarr or SEQ?
 
|-
 
|-
 
|REASON
 
|REASON
 
|reason
 
|reason
 
|Indicate the internal reason of an animate subject for some (course of) action or inference
 
|Indicate the internal reason of an animate subject for some (course of) action or inference
−
|
+
|Jeg var sint (så jeg ville ikke snakke med henne)
 
|-
 
|-
 
|RESTATE
 
|RESTATE
Line 316: Line 331:
 
|(Jeg og vennene mine driver med blogg.) Blogg er en nettside om meg selv.
 
|(Jeg og vennene mine driver med blogg.) Blogg er en nettside om meg selv.
 
|-
 
|-
−
|SUPP
+
|<strike>SUPP</strike>
−
|supplement
+
|<strike>supplement</strike>'''This tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted'''
 
|
 
|
−
|<could you give an example?
+
|<strike>could you give an example?</strike>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|REACT
 
|REACT
Line 334: Line 349:
 
|Reply to a question in dialogue (direct, indirect
 
|Reply to a question in dialogue (direct, indirect
 
or inferred)
 
or inferred)
 +
|-
 +
|N-FUNC
 +
|non-functional
 
|
 
|
 
|-}
 
|-}
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
 
−
======References======
 
−
 
−
<references/>
 

Latest revision as of 10:35, 28 February 2014

Overall Motivation

Dorothee's Presentation for download

The overall motivation is to create a richly annotated discourse corpus facilitating the analysis of student texts within writing research.

The main perspective taken is that of discourse analysis. Linguistic analysis is helpful, but not our main goal.

A student text is understood as a written discourse, and it is it mainly the argumentation structure of the discourse that we will be annotating.

So far we have identified a couple of Lexically-grounded discourse relations, but also talked about, Anchors and Discourse chains.

Lexically-grounded discourse relations we have listed in the sortable table below:

Lexically grounded discourse relations

Lexically-grounded discourse relations
Sense Grammatical category Connective
condition conjunction hvis
condition conjunction når
goal conjunction for å
sequence/temporal conjunction og
list conjunction og
precedence adverb etterpå
precedence adverb så
specification multi-word expression for eksempel
supplement adverb alias
disjunction conjunction eller
temporal conjunction når


Overall Motivation

Dorothee's Presentation for download

The overall motivation is to create a richly annotated discourse corpus facilitating the analysis of student texts within writing research.

The main perspective taken is that of discourse analysis. Linguistic analysis is helpful, but not our main goal.

A student text is understood as a written discourse, and it is it mainly the argumentation structure of the discourse that we will be annotating.

So far we have identified a couple of Lexically-grounded discourse relations, but also talked about, Anchors and Discourse chains.

Lexically-grounded discourse relations we have listed in the sortable table below:

Lexically grounded discourse relations

Lexically-grounded discourse relations
Sense Grammatical category Connective
condition conjunction hvis
condition conjunction når
goal conjunction for å
sequence/temporal conjunction og[1]
list conjunction og
precedence adverb etterpå
precedence adverb så
specification multi-word expression for eksempel
supplement adverb alias
disjunction conjunction eller[1]
temporal conjunction når


Sense Tags and their meanings

Having discussed with Cherise, we think that we will be best suited by relatively general categories to deal with young writer. Consequently we have the following suggestions about the sense tags:

The following tags should be skipped: -conjunction (is covered by more specific tags) -contingency (as above) -contra-expectation (sufficiently covered by Evaluate) -exception (subsumed under Condition) -expect (covered by Predict) -justify (covered by Reason) -opposition (covered by/ a special case of Contrast) -supplement (covered by Restate or Specify).

Lars, February 2014

Sense tags and their meanings
Sense tag Meaning Descriptive Definition Example
ASS assert Introduces a (new) topic, normally to be developed in the following sequence Jeg og vennene mine driver med blogg.
COM compare Point out similarity or points of correspondence

between two states, events, ideas, objects or statements

(Jeg tror at barna hadde det fint) men ikke like fint som vi har det i dag
ASSdesc assert through description Introduce a new setting, character or atmosphere of a narrative Det var morgen. (Morten våknet til en ny dag...)
ASSnar assert through narration Introduce a new narrative event or action that is not causally or hyponymically related to a previous event or action (nytt avsnitt:)Morten gikk ut av teltet og bort til bålet.
CONCES concession (Vi hadde det bra i hula) selv om det var lite mat noen ganger
COND condition Når man går går på skulen, lærer ein å lese, skrive, rekne...
CONJ conjunction how is this different from List? jf. "Og så må en venn støtte deg" (fra en tekst om vennskap)
CAUS cause Identify the external cause of an event or evaluation. To be distinguished from reason

or purpose

(Det er bra å gå på skule) for da får dei vener (og da...)
CONCLD conclude Draw a logical conclusion on the basis of previously

presented premises

EVAL evaluate Make a value judgement, state an opinion or

indicate a preference. Also used to indicate the significance of an object, idea or event previously introduced

(Alle skal få ein utdanning), og det er bra at barn går på skule...
META meta-statement Make a statement about the text itself Nå skal jeg svare på spørsmålene dine!
QUE question Ask a question that will be answered in a

following unit.

Hva ville du gjort? (Valgt en venn som...)
RESULT result Indicate an effect, outcome, result or

consequence

(Pappa og mamma jobber så mye) så jeg er ofte alene hjemme
SUM summarise Make a statement that summarises previous,

more specific statements, without drawing logical conclusions (vs. conclude)

Ja, det var det jeg gjør på dataen.
CONTIN contingency could you give an example?
C-EXPECT contra-expectation could you give an example?
CONT contrast Point out difference(s) between two events,

objects or ideas, openly signalled or inferred

(FNs barnekomvensjon har bestemt at barn skal få gå på skulen). Det er 75 mill som ikkje får skulegang. [inferred contrast]
DIS disjunction
EX exception could you give an example?
EXPEXT expect could you give an exampple?
PURP purpose
GEN generalise Make a more general statement that builds

on/includes previous specific statements

JUST justify This tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted could you give an example?
JUX juxtapose [=alternative?] <Could you give an example? cf (...hvis vennen din bommer på målet... Du må si: )Ååh, så synd. Du klarer det neste gang, ikke : Herregud, hvorfor gjorde du det, din fjott?
LIST list <how is this tag different from Conjunction? NP list here, or clause list?
OPP oppositionThis tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted how is this different from Contrast?
PRES precedence <hov is tis different from ASSnarr or SEQ?
REASON reason Indicate the internal reason of an animate subject for some (course of) action or inference Jeg var sint (så jeg ville ikke snakke med henne)
RESTATE restate Rephrase or repeat a a previous assertion at

approximately the same level of generality

SEQ sequence temporally Indicate the temporal unfolding of a sequence of events or actions
SPEC specify enumerate specific facts or details (Jeg og vennene mine driver med blogg.) Blogg er en nettside om meg selv.
SUPP supplementThis tag has been used for annotation and can therefore not be deleted could you give an example?
REACT physical or mental actions Indicates physical or mental actions or change of states of

animates which result from previously introduced actions, events or states. REACT is differentiated from RESULT by being open to choice or idiosyncracy

RESP respond Reply to a question in dialogue (direct, indirect

or inferred)

N-FUNC non-functional
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Notice that 'og' and 'eller' can combine noun phrases, as in 'pc og mobilen' or verb phrases, as in 'jeg dusjer og fikser meg'. It is the latter case that we are interested in here.
Retrieved from "https://tc.polytext.io/w/index.php?title=Skrivesenter:Discourse_relations&oldid=13523"