Difference between revisions of "Talk:Annotating Tumbuka"
Jean Chavula (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Dorothee Beermann|Dorothee]] 10:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Dorothee Beermann|Dorothee]] 10:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nchunga is both singular as CL9 and plural as CL10. There are no affixes marking plurality. May be I could just add that CL10 on the glosses under nchunga 'beans'? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Kwa is simply a preposition and its not agreeing with any of the nouns. If it was used as an agreement marker, it would have been ku-a = kwa under class 16 which is a locative class. | ||
Revision as of 19:18, 20 February 2010
This page has developed nicely --Dorothee 13:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
I am interested in the annotation of the last three words: nchunga kwa Mary translated as beans for Mary.
- is there no plural noun class prefix on nchunga?
- kwa looks like a complex word composed of kw-a, with kw as the noun class agreement marker and a as a possessive marker. ??
Could you help Jean :)
--Dorothee 10:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Nchunga is both singular as CL9 and plural as CL10. There are no affixes marking plurality. May be I could just add that CL10 on the glosses under nchunga 'beans'?
Kwa is simply a preposition and its not agreeing with any of the nouns. If it was used as an agreement marker, it would have been ku-a = kwa under class 16 which is a locative class.