Difference between revisions of "Persian object cliticalization"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{Source|source=written material|author=Pollet Samvelian, Jesse tsenge|editor=Atena Mahmoodan|title=Persian object clitics and the syntax-morphology interface|date/place=3.29.2012 NTNU|volume/pages=6|Olanguage=Persian|ISBN=|publisher=|translanguage=|translator=|onlinedistribution=|type=article|annotator=|contributor=|corpustranslator=|link=|article=a | + | {{Source|source=written material|author=Pollet Samvelian, Jesse tsenge|editor=Atena Mahmoodan|title=Persian object clitics and the syntax-morphology interface|date/place=3.29.2012 NTNU|volume/pages=6|Olanguage=Persian|ISBN=|publisher=|translanguage=|translator=|onlinedistribution=|type=article|annotator=|contributor=|corpustranslator=|link=|article=In this paper we focus on the use of pronominal clitics to realize the object of a verb, as in (2c), where<br>the enclitic -aš attaches to the verb did after the inflectional suffix -am encoding the syntactically optional<br>subject. In formal language, clitic objects and independent syntactic objects are in complementary<br>distribution, but clitic doubling is frequent in colloquial registers}} |
Latest revision as of 13:23, 29 March 2012
Source | written material |
---|---|
Author/Creator/Speaker(s) | Pollet Samvelian, Jesse tsenge |
Editor/Recorded by/Broadcaster | Atena Mahmoodan |
Title | Persian object clitics and the syntax-morphology interface |
Original language | Persian |
Date/Place | 3.29.2012 NTNU |
Volume/Pages | 6 |
Type | article |
In this paper we focus on the use of pronominal clitics to realize the object of a verb, as in (2c), where
the enclitic -aš attaches to the verb did after the inflectional suffix -am encoding the syntactically optional
subject. In formal language, clitic objects and independent syntactic objects are in complementary
distribution, but clitic doubling is frequent in colloquial registers