Typecraft v2.5
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Skrivesenter:Discourse relations"

Line 8: Line 8:
 
The main perspective taken is that of discourse analysis. Linguistic analysis is helpful, but not our main goal.  
 
The main perspective taken is that of discourse analysis. Linguistic analysis is helpful, but not our main goal.  
  
−
A student text is understood as a written discourse, and it is its discourse structure that we will be annotating.
+
A student text is understood as a written discourse, and it is it mainly the argumentation structure of the discourse that we will be annotating.
  
−
So far we have identified only a couple of ''Lexically-grounded discourse relations'', ''Anchors'' and ''Discourse chains''.
+
So far we have identified a couple of ''Lexically-grounded discourse relations'', but also talked about, ''Anchors'' and ''Discourse chains''.
  
 
Lexically-grounded discourse relations we have listed in the sortable table below:
 
Lexically-grounded discourse relations we have listed in the sortable table below:
  
−
 
+
===Lexically grounded discourse relations===
  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"  
 
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"  
Line 69: Line 69:
 
|}
 
|}
  
 +
 +
===Sense Tags and their meanings===
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
 +
|+ Sense tags and their meanings
 +
|-
 +
! Sense tag
 +
! Meaning
 +
! Comment
 +
|-
 +
|ASS
 +
|assert
 +
|Introduces a new topic
 +
|-
 +
|COM
 +
|comparison
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|ASSdesc
 +
|assert through description
 +
|Introducing a new setting, character or atmosphere
 +
|-
 +
|ASSnar
 +
|assert through narration
 +
|Introducing a state or a new event or action
 +
|-
 +
|CONCES
 +
|concession
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|COND
 +
|condition
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|CONJ
 +
|conjunction
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|CAUS
 +
|cause
 +
|to be distinguished from reason or purpose
 +
|-
 +
|CONCLD
 +
|conclude
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|EVAL
 +
|evaluate
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|META
 +
|meta-statement
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|QUE
 +
|question
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|RESULT
 +
|result
 +
|also effect or outcome
 +
|-
 +
|SUM
 +
|summary
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|CONTIN
 +
|contingency
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|C-EXPECT
 +
|contra-expectation
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|CONT
 +
|contrast
 +
|openly signalled or inferred
 +
|-
 +
|DIS
 +
|disjunction
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|EX
 +
|exception
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|EXPEXT
 +
|expectation
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|PURP
 +
|purpose
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|GEN
 +
|generalization
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|JUST
 +
|justification
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|JUX
 +
|juxtaposition
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|LIST
 +
|list
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|OPP
 +
|opposition
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|PRES
 +
|precedence
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|REASON
 +
|reason
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|RESTATE
 +
|restatement
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|SEQ
 +
|sequence temporal
 +
|-
 +
|SPEC
 +
|specification
 +
|enumeration of specific facts or details
 +
|-
 +
|SUPP
 +
|supplement
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|}
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

Revision as of 11:47, 27 September 2013

Overall Motivation

Dorothee's Presentation for download

The overall motivation is to create a richly annotated discourse corpus facilitating the analysis of student texts within writing research.

The main perspective taken is that of discourse analysis. Linguistic analysis is helpful, but not our main goal.

A student text is understood as a written discourse, and it is it mainly the argumentation structure of the discourse that we will be annotating.

So far we have identified a couple of Lexically-grounded discourse relations, but also talked about, Anchors and Discourse chains.

Lexically-grounded discourse relations we have listed in the sortable table below:

Lexically grounded discourse relations

Lexically-grounded discourse relations
Sense Grammatical category Connective
condition conjunction hvis
condition conjunction når
goal conjunction for å
sequence/temporal conjunction og[1]
list conjunction og
precedence adverb etterpå
precedence adverb så
specification multi-word expression for eksempel
supplement adverb alias
disjunction conjunction eller[1]
temporal conjunction når


Sense Tags and their meanings

Sense tags and their meanings
Sense tag Meaning Comment
ASS assert Introduces a new topic
COM comparison
ASSdesc assert through description Introducing a new setting, character or atmosphere
ASSnar assert through narration Introducing a state or a new event or action
CONCES concession
COND condition
CONJ conjunction
CAUS cause to be distinguished from reason or purpose
CONCLD conclude
EVAL evaluate
META meta-statement
QUE question
RESULT result also effect or outcome
SUM summary
CONTIN contingency
C-EXPECT contra-expectation
CONT contrast openly signalled or inferred
DIS disjunction
EX exception
EXPEXT expectation
PURP purpose
GEN generalization
JUST justification
JUX juxtaposition
LIST list
OPP opposition
PRES precedence
REASON reason
RESTATE restatement
SEQ sequence temporal
SPEC specification enumeration of specific facts or details
SUPP supplement
  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 Notice that 'og' and 'eller' can combine noun phrases, as in 'pc og mobilen' or verb phrases, as in 'jeg dusjer og fikser meg'. It is the latter case that we are interested in here.
Retrieved from "https://tc.polytext.io/w/index.php?title=Skrivesenter:Discourse_relations&oldid=13021"