Difference between revisions of "Annotating Tumbuka"
m (moved Annotating Chichewa to Annotating Tumbuka: we want to use this page for work on Tumbuka) |
m (Protected "Annotating Tumbuka" ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 11:08, 11 February 2010
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
One of the challenges in glossing a Bantu language is the representation of the verb and its affixes. Bantu languages are agglutinating, and a verb in Chichewa can be preceded by several prefixes, and it can be followed by up to 3 suffixes. Suffixes can be followed by the end-clitics -nsóand -bé One way of representing verb affixation is through the use of verb schemata where the verb root is accompanied by slots (SLT) each of which hosts one or several affixes of a specific grammatical type.
| (NEG) | SUBJ.M | TA1 | (MOD) | (OM) | ROOT | (EXT) | (TA2) | FV |
| SLT1 | SLT2 | SLT3 | SLT4 | SLT5 | SLT6 | SLT7 | SLT8 | SLT9 |
Note that only the subject marker (expressing noun class agreement) a tense/aspect marker, both preceding the root
and a final vowel are obligatory, all other verb extensions are optional. The subject marker has a dual functional status; in case of
a realised subject it functions as an agreement marker,otherwise as an incorporated pronominal argument (see (Bresnan and Mchombo 1986, 1987)
.
| Slot | Suffix | Example | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negation | ||
| 2 | Subject agreement or Subject pro-form | ||
| 3 | Tense & Aspect | ||
| 4 | Modification | ||
| 5 | Object marker | ||
| 6 | Extension (Derivation) | ||
| 7 | Tense & Aspect | ||
| 8 | Final Vowel (Mood) |